
👋 Oi, mga repapips, Brian Dys here! I love music, photography, and creative stuff like UX design and art. This is a place where I collect my thoughts and works. Apart all these, I’m Jaycelle’s better half and Bryce’s dad. 🥰
Currently, my CSS folder structure is arranged in such a way (based on Group Buddies):
css |-- sass |-- default |-- structure |-- atoms |-- molecules |-- organisms
Originally, there’s an additional templates
folder alongside structure
. The common difficulty I encountered was categorizing a rule-set between molecules
and organisms
. I didn’t bother including templates
since I prefer to prioritize the object than the scope or context it is in.
To solve this difficulty, I plan to rearrange my SASS file structure and categorize rule-set files into just two folders:
The new structure would be:
css |-- sass |-- default |-- structure |-- objects |-- components
Two of the ways in which you can show an illusion of a button being pressed are: darkening the background-color
and nudging its vertical position.
See the Pen Press Time by Brian Dys Sahagun (@briandys) on CodePen.
It is important to provide for a hint when a user activates an element in your user interface (in this example, a button). The feedback assures the user that the element “responds” to his action.
The advantage of using transform: translateY
is that it does not affect the elements around it (unlike using margin
or padding
).
In its basic sense, HTML is standalone. It is independent from CSS especially from the perspective of screenreaders and search engine crawlers. This goes to show about the importance of semantics and content structure in the HTML markup.
In this regard, I strongly advocate for the manipulation of the style sheet instead of the manipulation of the HTML markup.
Consider the scenario wherein you, as the front-end designer, have only 3 chances in having control over the HTML markup and on the other hand, an unlimited number of revisions and updates on the visual design aspect of the project.
This indeed is a far-fetched situation – but it definitely will get us creative in setting up the HTML markup or in planning ahead. This scenario encourages us to use semantic names in the class
attribute of the HTML markup as opposed to peppering it with presentational class names which are heavily tied up with the style sheet.
In this basic HTML and CSS tutorial, we are going to demonstrate the following:
position: absolute
and padding
And some disclaimers:
HTML markup is intended for chunks of text content to have meaning for web browsers (screenreaders and search engine crawlers too, among others that I am not aware of) so that they could very well translate the content into something that people would understand easily.
The text content along with its HTML markup must stand alone without the CSS layer. The content structure must remain intact and must be established before fully considering the visual design. Imagine writing a document in rich text format wherein you could create headings, lists, etc.
This separation prevents the compromise of the content structure. For example, in a visual design mock-up it is shown that the navigation is located on top of the brand logo – in the HTML, should the author be putting the navigation markup first before the brand name markup or vice versa?
In web design, it is not our ultimate goal to only replicate the visual design mock-up using HTML and CSS. While it is important to achieve visual quality, there’s an optimal approach in doing it while adhering to HTML’s semantic intentions. And semantics is the way to properly communicate with search engine crawlers and screenreaders. And of course, ultimately the people to whom the information is served.
The “Next Post” and “Previous Post” links are common in blog websites. Sometimes they also contain the article titles. Here’s a sample screenshot from PetaPixel.
Let’s say we want to show the article titles along with their respective labels; the raw content would follow this structure:
Previous Post: Previous article title
Next Post: Next article title
We give importance to the previous article that’s why it’s on top. But if our intention is for the reader to read forward to newer posts, we put the next article on top.
<label>Previous Post:</label> <a>Previous article title</a>
<label>Next Post:</label> <a>Next article title</a>
Marking up in HTML involves semantics – meaning, assign the HTML element that conveys the meaning of that content. Sometimes it is objective and sometimes it depends on the HTML author’s intention.
In our example, the objective nature of “Previous Post:” is that it is a label and it is also our intention – for it to be a simple text label that’s why we marked it up by the HTML label
tag. For the article title, our intention is for it to be a link, so we marked it up by the HTML a
tag.
But since the label
tag is intended for form elements, we choose another HTML tag that could convey the label meaning. Unfortunately, there isn’t any other HTML element intended for labels outside of forms. Here will come in handy, the generic inline tag which is span
. Only use it as a last resort if you can’t match the content with its semantic HTML tag.
<span>Previous Post:</span> <a>Previous article title</a>
<span>Next Post:</span> <a>Next article title</a>
<span class="label">Previous Post:</span> <a href="#">Previous article title</a>
<span class="label">Next Post:</span> <a href="#">Next article title</a>
Since span
is a generic element, we must put a class
attribute with a class name to make it semantic.
<span class="label">Post Navigation</span>
<span class="label">Previous Post:</span> <a href="#">Previous article title</a>
<span class="label">Next Post:</span> <a href="#">Next article title</a>
Consider these links as one control – a type of navigation that aids the reader to navigate through old and new articles. In this regard, we could label it “Post Navigation”.
Remember about the separation of HTML and CSS? Apart from giving importance to the content structure (the arrangement of content according to its importance from top to bottom), we should also give importance to the bare HTML document that is displayed in the web browser.
Does the content displayed conveys the content structure? Does it show hierarchy of information? Or the very least, is it readable? One could argue that it is readable – although we could further improve its readability by further improving its sematics.
We will be adding several HTML tags not to “fix” the layout of what the browser displays but to be more semantic which in turn, positively affects the way the content is displayed and laid out in the web browser.
<div class="post-navigation">
<span class="label">Post Navigation</span>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Previous Post:</span> <a href="#">Previous article title</a></li>
<li><span class="label">Next Post:</span> <a href="#">Next article title</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
Here comes the importance of knowing if an HTML element is block-level element or an inline-level element. To simply put, block-level elements simply block off the entire width of the space it occupies while inline-level elements could be joined together on a line – just like in our example on Step 5.
So, basically, span
is an inline-level element, as well as a
that’s why they are displayed all on one line.
Use div
to contain components or content when there’s no appropriate HTML elements that match. Another thing is div
provide for the flexibility to nest or contain any kind of HTML element unlike p
, HTML standards does not allow it to contain a div
, for example.
Personally, I would use p
or the paragraph tag as a substitute for div
as a block-level element. This is OK for simple text content.
ul
stands for unordered list. I intend to treat the previous and next content to be a list of actions. Though one could also simply intend to treat them as they are, like:
<div class="post-navigation">
<p class="label title">Post Navigation</p>
<p class="previous-action"><span class="label">Previous Post:</span> <a href="#">Previous article title</a></p>
<p class="next-action"><span class="label">Next Post:</span> <a href="#">Next article title</a></p>
</div>
But I prefer using ul
as it conveys structure.
That’s more readable, right? While its underlying markup wasn’t constructed to convey layout but meaning.
Now that we got it going for us in terms of readability, we can now proceed to setting-up our HTML markup for CSS considerations.
While the HTML markup of the example above is OK on its own, we must remember that working with CSS requires us to easily pinpoint or target HTML elements directly or at least using fewer selectors, otherwise it would be very difficult to style such elements. We could achieve this by naming HTML elements thru the class
attribute. And these attribute values we will use as selectors to pinpoint the HTML element.
<div class="post-navigation">
<p class="label title">Post Navigation:</p>
<ul class="action-list">
<li class="previous-action"><span class="label">Previous Post:</span> <a href="#">Previous article title</a></li>
<li class="next-action"><span class="label">Next Post:</span> <a href="#">Next article title</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
Here, we specifically classified “previous-action” and “next-action” so that we could easily pinpoint it during the CSS phase. Of course, apart from CSS considerations, this approach is an added semantics to our HTML document because apart from marking up the content as a list, we specified what type of content are contained within each list item.
At this point, I wouldn’t say that classifying each HTML element is purely for semantic purposes only because we are already transitioning towards the CSS phase, thus pre-CSS.
Watch our for the second and last part of this tutorial tomorrow wherein we will demonstrate that CSS could simply transform the content displayed top to be laid out at the bottom (or anywhere else).
Ever use Spotify? It’s been around for many years now but just two months ago it landed here in Philippines – making everyone curb their Aegis.
No doubt that the traditional rectangle image has lost its edge literally. CSS border-radius
enabled designers to carve the sharp edges into rounded corners. And take it to the extreme, the corners vanish and the shape becomes a circle.
Spotify’s app presents album and artist covers in a circular manner with the same picture faded in the background.
This is what we’ll recreate using HTML and CSS.
Your content will flow through various containers (called regions) which you specify.
The CSS regions module allows content to flow across multiple areas called regions. The regions are not necessarily contiguous in the document order. The CSS regions module provides an advanced content flow mechanism, which can be combined with positioning schemes as defined by other CSS modules such as the Multi-Column Module [CSS3COL] or the Grid Layout Module [CSS3-GRID-LAYOUT] to position the regions where content flows.
Imagine a magazine layout where you could have multiple columns in your article or where the cut of a paragraph continues to the next page.
With all these CSS developments going on, one could really build a web app based on HTML and CSS as its front-end.
We’re really in the 21st century.
Also, checkout Adobe & HTML’s page on CSS Regions.
I’m being confounded about an article I’ve read about your logo being an image (and not a background image). You would notice about the differences between the two wherein img
puts your actual image on the page and h1
replaces the text with a background image of your logo.
You may be using one method over the other — and to calm your nerves down, Facebook and WordPress use h1
approach while Google and Firefox use img
approach (and a whole lot of different combinations for other sites out there).
Now, I won’t go into details about both methods because I’m sure you’re already using one — even different from the two mentioned. What’s important is the answer to “why are we using what we use?”
The answer lies on your priorities.
If you’ve answered the former, then most likely you’re using h1
approach and the latter, img
approach.
Personally, the way I test if I’m writing a web document properly is I strip it off everything — images and CSS — and see if it still makes sense from having semantic HTML elements to its document outline. And one of the natural steps in this test is having a heading on top of your document — usually the title of the site — it could be a logo or an photograph with an inscription — but what it represents is more important.
There are lots of combinations in putting up a logo on your webpage — just be conscious of why you’re choosing one approach over the other.